Bought this for my 9 year old daughter and it seems to be a good value. Had some trouble getting it to power up at one point and found that it didn't work well on regular alkaline AA batteries and had to get Kodak's batteries.
Overall a good lower end camera. See more reviews about:Kodak EasyShare C713 7MP Digital Camera (Pink)
I bought this camera because the consumer reviews were excellent, and my first impression of the camera was very good also, based on size, handling characteristics, and the way photos displayed on the 2.7" screen on the back of the camera. However I had business distractions and didn't display my photos on a full-size screen until after the Amazon return time expired. The image quality of my camera (perhaps I have a lemon) is very poor when compared to my three year old Olympus point-and-shoot. I was shocked at how "soft" the images were when viewed on a 15" computer screen. I took identical comparison shots using a tripod and self-timer to verify that I wasn't seeing motion, but in sunlight or low light, the images are visibly and objectionably soft. Around bright patches, such as sky showing through the leaves a tree in the foreground, there is heavy blue fringing, and some sections of the photos are "foggy" as though a fingerprint was on the lens, but there were no fingerprints or debris on the lens. There are noticeable blotches of off-color (like "noise," but bigger) in shadow areas, even at low ISO. I should have tested the camera better, sooner, and I blame myself and my schedule for not doing that.
Here is the lesson:(1) Don't buy a camera unless you can thoroughly test it immediately, including judging the image quality on a large screen, not the screen on the camera. (2) Order the correct memory chip the first time, so you don't get delayed waiting for the correct chip to arrive. This Sony is not compatible with all SD memory chips. (3) Compare the camera against another camera of known qualities, but do in time to take advantage of Amazon's return option.I've shipped my camera to the repair center in Texas and it hasn't returned yet.If they fix it satisfactorily, I'll amend this evaluation to say so. OCTOBER 17, 2008 UPDATE:The camera was promptly returned from Sony service in Texas with no notation or explanation regarding what repair, if any, was done. The post-return images seem very much like the former ones I complained about. However, I have softened my criticism a bit because I think my original expectations were too high. This is a quite small, light, easily carried and concealed camera with intuitive controls and it has a reasonable optical viewfinder. For it's size, it does the job well enough, so, in retrospect, I think I was expecting a bigger camera's performance from an instrument I purchased on account of it's very small size. That expectation might have been unreasonable in some degree. I also have a Canon G10, which costs twice as much and is two and a half times heavier. The Canon takes lovely pictures, but I find myself carrying around the Sony most often because it is so small and so light (6 oz. with battery), which is a compelling argument in its favor. See more reviews about:Sony Cybershot DSCW170/B 10.1MP Digital Camera with 5x Optical Zoom with Super Steady Shot (Black)
So I'm going to an amusement park and I'm hesitant to bring my digital camera. Disposable film cameras are always an option, I just hate not knowing what it looks like before it's printed. My friend asked me about disposable digital cameras but I'm not sure I understand how it works. Are you able to scroll through pictures and delete them if you don't like them? Do you connect it to your computer? Help?
Best Answer: First - this is NOT a dumb question The concept of a disposable camera that lets you get digital, pictures is an advertising ploy. One of the companies (I don't recall which one) advertises that when you return your disposable camera for processing, they will transfer the pictures to a CD so you end up with "digital pictures". But it is still a film camera and no more than that.
- you use the digital camera to take pictures and you can see them on a screen, you can get them printed out when your done. and then you can throw it out. =] thats why its disposable u cant connect them to your computer unless it comes with a memory card that you can conect to your computer
- No, it's still just a disposable camera. It's just suppose to take better pictures. You can't see them instantly like a real digital camera.
- no you take pics but cant delete/see them, then go get the camera developed which then gives you the photos and the camera can only be used once hense are disposable
- you take pictures, and then you take to a photo place, the develop them. WALAH~!
- I dont think they exist, but if they do, ask the friend who suggested it to you for help.
- You press a button and it takes a picture. Wow, you certainly are a bright one there, cowboy.
- Like a prostitute. Just use them, get what you want, and then trash them!!!
- HELL0....G0 T0 THE ST0RE AND ASK H0W D0ES iT W0RK!!!! DUH?!?
im looking for a digital camera with good optical zoom, sharp clear pictures and its fast between taking pictures and its good in the dark when taking pictures. If yours is what i described please tell me what kind of camera you have
Best Answer: We have a Sony Cybershot. 7 Mega pixels. The picture is very clear. Zoom is fantastic. The software is easy to use and can be modified to your desires. Light, versatile, easy to turn on. The time to turn on isn't too long. The only thing i do not like is that my boyfriends mom got the same one! She could have gotten the red version!
- I have Sony F828. I absolutely love this beast. It does everything, even night vision. The only problem is noise with ISO over 200.
- I have a Canon Digital Rebel XT 350D. I like that there is no delay between snaps. Its just click, click, click. I shoot alot of sports photography and so far its working good for me until i can afford the 30D
- Canon S1 IS - It's only 3 mega pixel! Takes good movies and pics but I want the new 5 mega pixel version. CCDs are given to apparent pixelation in low light unless super-cooled. The firmware programs in the camera compensates for this but does not eliminate it.
- I have a Sony Digital and it uses the mini disc but I dont like the fact that i only has 3.2 MP but I like the fact that I can use a wide angle lense attachment.I need to get new camera like a 10 MP that shoots many frames per second.
- I have an Olympus 5050. This is a wonderful little 5mb camera for several reasons. 1. It takes rechargeable AA batteries not a special battery pack 2. It takes several different digital cards, CF, Smart, Xd 3. It has glass optics 4. A pivoting rear LCD screen 5. With only a couple of attachments you can add wide angle and telephoto lenses, plus a UV filter to protect the front element 6. It has a solid feel, not a cheap plastic look 7. There is a users group that is just wonderful. Ask ANY question and these guys can give you the answer (Just wonderful people) They also stay up on repair problems, new Olympus equipment and have a fun photo contest. 8. It makes great photos at the lower ASAs That is just off the top of my head. However, I'm sorry to say they no longer make the camera but I see it on eBay every so often. You might get one from someone going to a digital SLR.
- I have the Canon Digital Rebel XT.. It's an SLR so will be more expensive than some of the point and shoots, but it is well worth it. As far as SLR's go, it is a great camera and less expensive than many SLR's. You can find a camera with the body or the lens, or you may choose to buy the lens and body separately. There are many lensess to choose from, and you can certainly find one tailored to your needs. I use a lense that goes from 24 to 90, which means it goes from wide angle to telephoto. The pictures are very clear and it has manual and automatic functions. If you want to take pictures in the dark, it comes with a good flash and a boot for if you want to buy a bigger flash. You can also do a long exposure with a tripod, which eliminates the need for a flash.
- In a word, Sony Cybershot
- I have the new Canon 30D 8mega-pixels. Works extraordinary with Canon L series lens and average with the 18-55 as starter lens given with kit. Has plenty options in camera to grow to a professional level. The downside of camera L series lenses are they are fairly expensive.
Read More ...
I am really interested in photography and I am thinking about giving it a shot, but at this point I know nothing about digital cameras. Any suggestions on a good digital camera for a beginner photographer would be great. I have a very plain and simple dig. cam but I think I need something with a little more quality. Thanks a bunch.
Best Answer: The camera I suggest is a bit more in features than just point and shoot. But it is a point and shoot type. It's the Canon PowerShot A570 IS. It has an image stabilizer in case you have shaky hands, aperture/shutter priority, takes 2 rechargeable batteries and the price is quite good . Can be bought between $155-$170+a memory card. Anyone who buys a digital camera has to buy a memory card. I suggest for a 7 megapixel camera which this camera is , get at least 1 GB memory card. The camera has a viewfinder which won't drain your batteries like an LCD screen does. It's 4X optical zoom. This camera and a memory card should cost you no more than $190- to $200-. Minimum for an SLR( which is really getting into photography) is about $500-a SLR kit. So you have to ponder the thought, do I have the time and money to really get into this hobby(possibly business) and start out with a SLR camera. Take a trip to your local library and read about different features on cameras in Nov'07 Consumer Reports. Also check out Website dpreview.com for reviews of many cameras and prices.
- If you want to start off into serious photography... this is the least you want to spend... http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Rebe... Better still... http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000I1Z... You can't go wrong with Canon. If you go with anything less than a DSLR, you'll just want to upgrade your camera again when you start learning more about photography. Spend the money once and you'll be happy for a good, long time. This class of camera has better light sensitivity and less noise due to the larger lens and sensor... a full compliment of manual controls... They're compatible with different lenses and filters... external flashes... They are still capable of fully automatic shooting so you can learn at your own pace. The picture quality is superb.
- Olympus is great. Try one around 300$.
- For Photography go with Film first!! Try a Nikon FM-10. If you really want digital....any of the nikons will do.
- My friend had a photography class and the teacher told them to buy optical cameras instead of digital cameras. Apparently he thought they were superior to digital cameras but i couldn't tell you why other then maybe the quality is a little better. I know for sure they last a lot longer. With digital prints the paint eventually fades over the years.
- panasonic luminex. very good ratings
- If you're taking classes, they'll probably tell you what to get, and a lot of students will get discounts through their schools. My friend is a photographer and he started with Nikon D200. It's a little pricey (over $1200 for just the body.) The D40 seems to be a good introductory digital SLR that you can teach yourself to use. Same with the Canon Digital Rebel Xti. You can get these SLR's for under $500
- First, you need to choose a camera type: - SLR - Compact - SLR-like If you do not want to become thoroughly engrossed in the digital photography world and waste all your money to lenses and flashes, it is better to begin with a compact camera. For more, be my guest at: http://fototramp.blogspot.com/2007/11/co... There are some good and not expencive models as Canon Powershot A630 for abt. $270, Canonn SX100 for $280 -- look at:http://fototramp.blogspot.com/2007/11/ca... and Fujifilm FinePix F40 -- http://fototramp.blogspot.com/2007/12/fu... These models have a large (for a compact) sensor and more than enough mega pixels. Do not look at any cool but useless features and 10-12 mega pixels. It is an excess for a good compact. Regards
- You're asking what car will teach you to drive -- you can figure out the answer.
- If you have the money I suggest the Nikon D300 or D200, or D80. Easy to use controls and a 2.5" screen to view. www.besybuy.com www.samys.com (my favorite) ww.costco.com Recommend a Scandisk memory card, about 2GB. Check you Sunday paper for ad sales or coupons.
- Pass on any Canon Rebel since they do not have image stabilization, only in their highly priced specialty lenses. And that also applies to the Nikon D200. There's another alternative which you should check into: The new Olympus DSLR E-510 10 megapixel 2-lens camera kit with built-in image stabilization and active CMOS which is found only in the Nikon 200 and 300. And the E510 can be set to "vivid" colors. The 2-lens starter kit sells for around $689 at samys.com which currently does not charge the $58.00 CA sales tax up through Wednesday, December 12th. Good luck!
Read More ...
Bought this for my 9 year old daughter and it seems to be a good value. Had some trouble getting it to power up at one point and found that it didn't work well on regular alkaline AA batteries and had to get Kodak's batteries.
I bought this camera because the consumer reviews were excellent, and my first impression of the camera was very good also, based on size, handling characteristics, and the way photos displayed on the 2.7" screen on the back of the camera. However I had business distractions and didn't display my photos on a full-size screen until after the Amazon return time expired. The image quality of my camera (perhaps I have a lemon) is very poor when compared to my three year old Olympus point-and-shoot. I was shocked at how "soft" the images were when viewed on a 15" computer screen. I took identical comparison shots using a tripod and self-timer to verify that I wasn't seeing motion, but in sunlight or low light, the images are visibly and objectionably soft. Around bright patches, such as sky showing through the leaves a tree in the foreground, there is heavy blue fringing, and some sections of the photos are "foggy" as though a fingerprint was on the lens, but there were no fingerprints or debris on the lens. There are noticeable blotches of off-color (like "noise," but bigger) in shadow areas, even at low ISO. I should have tested the camera better, sooner, and I blame myself and my schedule for not doing that.